<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: </title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.parrhesia.com/archives/7/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.parrhesia.com/archives/7</link>
	<description>politics, technology, law -- privacy, surveillance, cryptography</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 18:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Suzanne Nusbaum</title>
		<link>http://www.parrhesia.com/archives/7#comment-234</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzanne Nusbaum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 22:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.parrhesia.com/archives/7#comment-234</guid>
		<description>Karen Thorland, lead attorney in this litigation campaign by the Movie Producers Association of America (MPAA) against peer-topeer movie downloaders, gave an interesting talk about the structure of this type of litigation to the Copyright Committee of the IP Section of the California State Bar, on June 5, 2006.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Karen Thorland, lead attorney in this litigation campaign by the Movie Producers Association of America (MPAA) against peer-topeer movie downloaders, gave an interesting talk about the structure of this type of litigation to the Copyright Committee of the IP Section of the California State Bar, on June 5, 2006.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
